| 1 These studies were supported under Grants CA-23175. 
              CA-12800. and CA-15688 from the National Cancer Institute. and Grant 
              RR-00865 from the U.S. Public Health Service.2 Robert Peter Gale is a Scholar of the Leukemia Society of America.
 
 Departments of Medicine, Microbiology & Immunology and the Bone 
              Marrow Transplant Unit, UCLA School of Medicine. the Center for 
              the Health Sciences. Los Angeles, Calif. 90024. USA
 Introduction
 Acute leukemia is a neoplastic disease characterized by the abnormal 
              proliferation and accum illation of immature hematopoietic cells. 
              Progress in our understanding of this disease is reviewed in this 
              volume. Significant recent advances in the therapy of acute leukemia 
              include high remission rates in both acute lymphoblastic (ALL) and 
              acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), the prevention of central nervous 
              system leukemia in ALL, and development of moderately effective 
              remission maintenance programs, particularly in ALL. Despite this 
              progress, approximately 50 per cent of patients with ALL and over 
              95 per cent of those with AML will eventually die of resistant leukemia. 
              Recent studies at our institution and others have clearly demonstrated 
              the feasibility of transplantation of normal hematopoietic stem 
              cells in man. In view of this, and because of the disappointing 
              results of chemotherapy in patients with acute leukemia who relapse, 
              we studied the potential role of bone marrow transplantation in 
              resistant acute leukemia. In this chapter I will briefly review 
              some basic aspects of the biology and immunology of marrow transplantation 
              and discuss its applicability to leukemia.  Cell Biology and Immunology of Bone Marrow Transplantation
  The hematopoietic system is derived from pluripotent stem cells. 
              These cells have several inherent characteristics relevant to marrow 
              transplantation including self-renewal potential, differentiative 
              capacity, and the presence of histocompatibility antigens (HLA) 
              on their surface. It is clearly possible to transplant hematopoietic 
              stem cells in man. Requirements for engraftment include histocompatibility 
              matching between donor and recipient, immunosuppression to prevent 
              graft rejection, and a critical dose of marrow cells. The latter 
              may relate to the clinical setting under which transplantation is 
              performed rather than an inherent characteristic of stem cell(s) 
              since a single cell may be capable of repopulating a congenitally 
              anemic non-irradiated mouse under appropriate conditions. The human 
              major histocompatibility complex (MHC), referred to as HLA, has 
              been assigned to chromosome 6. The HLA locus has been further subdivided 
              into the HLA-A, B, C, and D subloci. The first three are commonly 
              defined by serologic technics while the HLA-D region is conventionally 
              studied in the mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) test (for review see 
              [ 1 ]). Successful marrow transplants in man have been restricted 
              to HLAidentical siblings with few exceptions. While HLA is of prime 
              importance in determining graft outcome, other histocompatibility 
              systems are undoubtedly involved. Little is known regarding these 
              non-HLA systems and no attempt has been made to match for non-HLA 
              antigens in clinical transplantation. This factor probably accounts 
              for the high incidence of graft rejection and graft-versus-host 
              disease (GVHD). There is a high degree of polymorphism in the HLA 
              system. Since these antigens are inherited in a Mendelian fashion 
              as codominant alleles, there is a reasonable possibility (25 per 
              cent) of finding an HLA-identical donor within a family. In the 
              general population the probability is in the range of one in 10.000. 
              Because of this, most transplants have been performed between HLA-identical 
              siblings. Despite profound hematopoietic suppression, patients with 
              aplasia and acute leukemia are capable of rejecting allogeneic grafts. 
              Immunosuppression is therefore necessary to achieve sustained marrow 
              engraftment. Pretransplant immunosuppression, referred to as conditioning. 
              has utilized chemotherapy and radiation either singly or in combination. 
              Since doses used in these regimens are supralethal, rescue with 
              normal marrow is essen tial for survival. The transplant procedure 
              is relatively simple. Approximately one liter of bone marrow is 
              removed from the donor by aspiration from the posterior iliac crests. 
              A single cell suspension is prepared and infused intravenously to 
              the recipient. The infused cells home to the marrow after a brief 
              delay in the lungs and spleen. The usual dose is 1-5 X 10 high 8 
              nucleated marrow cells per kg. In most instances discrete clusters 
              (colonies) of hematopoiesis are observed in the marrow with the 
              first 2 weeks following transplantation [3]. These clusters are 
              usually either erythroid or granulocytic, but mixed populations 
              are occasionally observed. Peripheral white blood cells and platelets 
              begin to rise within 2-3 weeks following transplantation and may 
              return to normal levels by 1-2 months. Cytogenetic and gene marker 
              studies clearly indicate that red cells, granulocytes, lymphocytes, 
              platelets, monocytes, and hepatic and alveolar macrophages are ofdonor 
              origin [4,14,16]. Following successful engraftment, the recipient 
              is at risk to develop several immune-related problems including 
              graft rejection, graft-versushost disease (GVHD), post-transplant 
              immunodeficiency, interstitial pneumonitis, and infectious complications 
              (Table 1). Recurrent leukemia is an additional potential complication 
              in leukemic recipients. Graft rejection probably results from histoincompatibility 
              between donor and recipient and may be facilitated by immunization 
              of the recipient via blood transfusions. In some instances defects 
              in the marrow microenvironment may be responsible for graft failure 
              [5]. Graft failure occurs in  Table I. Areas of investigation 
 Graft rejection Resistant
 leukemia Graft-vs-host disease
 Immunodeficicncy
 Interstitial pneumonia
 Infectious disease complications
 20-40 per cent of patients with aplastic anemia but is rare in 
              patients with leukemia. This may relate to either inherent differences 
              between the two diseases or to the more intensive conditioning used 
              in leukemics. Storb and coworkers have reported a correlation between 
              graft rejection and both recipient anti-donor immunity and marrow 
              dose [15], and we have reported a correlation with pre-transplant 
              lymphocytotoxins [6]. Transfusions also contribute to graft rejection. 
              Graft-versus-host disease results from the introduction of immunocompetent 
              donor cells into the immunosuppressed recipient. Principle target 
              organs of GVHD include the lymphoid system, skin, liver, and gastrointestinal 
              tract [17]. GVHD in man results from incomplete matching for nonHLA 
              histocompatibility antigens. The loss of normal immune regulatory 
              mechanisms and autoimmunity may also contribute. While GVHD initially 
              results from immune stimulation, the end result is immunodeficiency. 
              The incidence of GVHD following HLA-identical marrow transplantation 
              is 70 per cent, and over one-half of these cases are fatal. The 
              prevention and treatment of GVHD are problematic. Methotrexate is 
              routinely given prophylactically to modify GVHD, but this is not 
              completely effective. Attempts to prevent GVHD with antithymocyte 
              globulin (A TG) or to treat it with A TG , corticosteroids, and 
              other imm unosuppressive drugs have been largely unsuccessful. While 
              complete histocompatibility matching would theoretically prevent 
              GVHD, this approach would further limit the number of potential 
              candidates for bone marrow transplantation. The removal of immunocompetent 
              cells from the marrow inoculum prior to transplantation by either 
              physical or immunologic technics has appeal but has not been critically 
              evaluated in man. The complete prevention of GVHD is not necessarily 
              desirable since GVHD may have anti-leukemic effects. Allogeneic 
              marrow transplantation is followed by a period of immunodeficiency 
              lasting several months to 1-2 years [7,20]. The cause of the immunodeficiency 
              is multifactoral and includes abnormal or delayed lymphoid differentiation, 
              GVHD, and the effects of immunosuppressive drugs. Posttransplant 
              immunodeficiency is characterized by abnormalities of both T and 
              B lymphocyte function including decreased antibody synthesis, decreased 
              responsiveness to polyclonal mitogens, and inability to be sensitized 
              to dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB). Reactivity to alloantigens and skin 
              graft rejection are normal. This immunodeficiency is correctable 
              with time. This suggest that either a small number of lymphoid precursors 
              are engrafted. or that their development is delayed. We have found 
              no evidence of suppressor cells or factors in these patients [7]. 
              Approximately 60-70 per cent of marrow graft recipients develop 
              interstitial pneumonitis [ II ]. The incidence is higher in leukemic 
              patients than in aplastics. One-half of cases are related to cytomegalovirus 
              (CMV), 10 per cent to pneumocystis, and 10 per cent to other viruses. 
              No etiology is identified in the remaining cases. It is likely that 
              immunologic factors including immune stimulation, immunodeficiency, 
              and GVHD playa critical role in the development of interstitial 
              pneumonitis. Radiation and/or chemotherapy are probably not primary 
              factors but may compromise resistance. In CMV pneumonitis, it is 
              likely that both reactivation of latent endogenous infection and 
              exogenous infection are important factors. Attempts to prevent or 
              treat interstitial pneumonitis with antiviral chemotherapy (ara-A) 
              have been unsuccessful. Studies of CMV immune globulin, or plasma 
              and interferon, are currently underway at several centers. Bacterial 
              and fungal infections are an important complication of bone marrow 
              transplantation [19]. These usually occur during the period of granulocytopenia 
              immediately following the transplant and their magnitude is related 
              to the intensity of the conditioning regimen. Most patients receive 
              oral non-absorbable antibiotics for gastrointestinal tract sterilization. 
              systemic antibiotics, and granulocyte transfusions. The value of 
              prophylactic granulocyte transfusions and laminar air flow environments 
              is controversial, but recent data suggest they may decrease the 
              incidence of infection without a substantial effect on survival 
              [2].  Current Results in Acute Leukemia
 The survival of patients with resistant acute leukemia is poor 
              with median survival of less than 6 months in several large series. 
              Because of this, we and others have studied the potential role of 
              allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients with resistant 
              disease. Transplantation in acute leukemia is difficult. In addition 
              to the previously described immunobiologic problems, it is necessary 
              to permanently eradicate the leukemic clone(s). A variety of chemotherapy-radiation 
              therapy regimens have been developed to achieve this goal. Three 
              representative regimens are indicated in Fig. I and remission and 
              survival data in Figs. 2 and 3 [8,9, 13, 18]. Several important 
              points emerge from these studies: I. Leukemic relapse is common 
              despite the use of supralethal levels of drugs or radiation; 2. 
              The risk of relapse is high during the first 2 years but lower thereafter; 
              3. That with the possible exception of SCAR! (see legend Fig. I), 
              more intensive conditioning has not been associated with a lower 
              relapse rate; and 4. 15-20 per cent of patients with resistant disease 
              may become long-term disease-free survivors. While this survival 
              rate is not a satisfactory end result. it is probably superior to 
              chemotherapy alone. It is noteworthy that immunologic problems rather 
              than resistant leukemia are the major cause of death in some series. 
              These problems may ultimately prove more soluble than resistant 
              leukemia. 
   Major features of bone marrow transplantation in leukemia are reviewed 
              in Table 2. It should be emphasized that 98 per cent of relapses 
              occur in recipient cells so that progress is dependent upon the 
              development of more effective conditioning regimens. Potential approaches 
              to this problem are indicated in Table 3. Perhaps the most promising 
              are the development of more effective regimens and transplantation 
              in remission. Preliminary data from Thomas and coworkers has indicated 
              a low relapse rate in patients transplanted in remission. Finally. 
              the introduction of new myelosuppressive drugs or innovative uses 
              of radiation may improve the results of transplantation in acute 
              leukemia.
  Table 2. Leukemic recurrence following bone marrow transplantation
 
 Indefinite time at risk
 Predominantly in recipient cells
 Maintains genetic markers of original disease
 Residual normal hematopoiesis of donor origin
 Table 3. Approaches to decreasing the rate of leukemic 
              relapse
 
 More effective chemoradiotherapy
 Intensive chemoradiotherapy with optimal support facilities
 Treat leukemic "sanctuaries'.
 Transplant before "resistance" develops
 Combination of approaches
 
 Future Directions
  Future research in this field must concentrate on two critical 
              problems: 1. More effective leukemia eradication and, 2. solutions to immunologic 
              problems including GVHD, immunodeficiency, and interstitial pneumonitis. 
              With regard to the first area, I have discussed the development 
              of more effective conditioning regimens and transplantation in remission. 
              GVHD is a difficult problem and it now seems clear that prevention 
              is critical. Based on animal data. the selective elimination of 
              immunocompetent cells from the graft by either physical or immunologic 
              technics seems a logical step. Immunodeficiency is probably best 
              approached by steps to facilitate the rate of lymphoid maturation. 
              These might conceivably involve transplants of thymic epitheli um 
              of the use of thymic hormones. Progress in the area of interstitial 
              pneumonitis will depend on an understanding of the etiologic and 
              pathogenic mechanisms involved. Trials of CMV immune plasma and 
              interferon are currently in progress. Development of more effective 
              antiviral chemotherapy such as phosphonoacetic acid for CMV infection 
              is clearly needed. Progress in GVHD and immunodeficiency may have 
              a beneficial effect on interstitial pneumonitis. Finally, the possibility 
              of lungshielding should be considered in non-leukemic patients. 
              A recent area of considerable interest is autotransplantation using 
              cryopreserved remission bone marrow (for review see [ 10]). Preliminary 
              studies have clearly indicated that cryopreserved marrow can reconstitute 
              a lethally radiated recipient but leukemic relapse has been a major 
              obstacle. Whether this relates to residual leukemia in the patient 
              or in the cryopreserved marrow is as yet uncertain. The concept 
              of autotransplantation is of considerable theoretical interest since 
              these patients would not be at risk to develop many of the immunologic 
              problems associated with allogeneic transplantation such as GVHD. 
              Autotransplantation could expand the applicability of marrow transplantation 
              since most patients with leukemia lack an HLAidentical sibling donor. 
              Leukemic relapse remains the major problem in autotransplantation, 
              and at temps to deplete clinically undetectable leukemic cells from 
              remission marrow using either physical or immunologic technics need 
              to be critically evaluated. A final consideration is the use of 
              HLA-matched unrelated donors for patients without HLA-identical 
              siblings. Recent advances in histocompatibility testing, particularly 
              HLA-D typing, make this a possibility. Opelz and coworkers have 
              recently reviewed theoretical consideration involved in the development 
              of donor pools for unrelated marrow transplantation [12].
 Summary
  Bone marrow transplantation is an experimental approach to the 
              treatment of patients with acute leukemia, aplastic anemia, and 
              other neoplastic and genetic diseases. To date, long-term disease-free 
              survival has been achieved in a small proportion of carefully selected 
              patients with resistant acute leukemia. While results are not optimal, 
              they are acceptable in late stage patients where there are no effective 
              alternates. Major problems in marrow transplantation for leukemia 
              include tumor resistance and a spectrum of immunologic complications 
              including GVHD, immunodeficiency, and interstitial pneumonitis. 
              Potential approaches to these problems have been suggested. Progress 
              in anyone area would have a substantial impact on improving survival 
              and extending the applicability of marrow transplantation to patients 
              at an earlier stage of their disease. References
 I. Bach. F. H.. Van Rood. J.J.: The major histocompatibility complex. 
              N. Engl. J. Med. 295, 806-813: 872-878: 927-935 (1976) 
 2. Clift. R. A.. Sanders. J. E.. Thomas. E. D.. Williams. B.. Buckner. 
              C. D.: Granulocyte trans fusions for the prevention of infection 
              in patients receiving bone marrow transplants. N. Engl. J. Med. 
              298,1052-1057 (1978)
 
 3. Cline. M.J.. Gale. R. P.. Golde. D.W.: Discrete clusters of hematopoietic 
              cells in the mar row cavity. Blood 50,709-712 (1977)
 
 4. Gale. R. P.. Sparkes. R. S.. Golde. D.W.: Bone marrow origin 
              or hepatic macrophages (Kupffer cells) in man. Science. 201,937-938 
              (1978)
 
 5. Gale. R. P.. Feig. S. A.. Fitchen. .J. A.. Falk. P. M.. Sparkes. 
              R. S.. Cline. M.J.: Bone marrow transplantation in identical twins 
              with aplastic anemia. In press.
 
 6. Gale. R. P.. Fitchen. J. H.. Cahan. M.. Opelz. G.. Cline. M. 
              J. (For the UCLA Bone Marrow Transplant Team): Pretransplant Iymphocytotoxins 
              and bone marrow graft rejection. Lancet I, 170-1272 ( 1978)
 
 7. Gale. R. P.. Opelz. G.. Mickey. M. R.. Graze. P. R.. Saxon. A. 
              (For the UCLA Bone Mar row Transplant Team): Immunodeficiency following 
              allogeneic bone marrow transplanta tion. Transplant. Proc. 10,223-228 
              ( 1978)
 
 8. Gale. R. P. (For the UCLA Bone Marrow Transplant Team): Approaches 
              to leukemic relapse following bone marrow transplantation. Transplant. 
              Proc. 10,167-172 (1978)
 
 9. Gale. R. P. (For the UCLA Bone Marrow Transplant Team): Bone 
              marrow transplantation in acute leukemia. Lancet 2, 1197-1200 ( 
              1977)
 
 10. Graze. P. R.. Gale. R. P.: Autotransplantation for leukemia 
              and solid tumors. Transplant. Proc. 10, 177-186 ( 1978)
 
 II. Neiman. P. E.. Reeves. W.. Ray. G.. Flournoy. N.. Lerner. K. 
              G.. Sale. G. E.. Thomas. E. D.: A prospective analysis of interstitial 
              pneumonia and opportunistic viral infection among recipients of 
              allogeneic bone marrow grafts. l. Infect. Dis. 136, 754-767 ( 1977)
 
 12. Opelz. G.. Mickey. M. R.. Terasaki. P. I.: Unrelated donors 
              for bone marrow transplanta tion and transfusion support: pool sizes 
              req uired. Tran.splan t. Proc. 6,405-409 ( 1974 )
 
 13. Santos. G. W.. Sensenbrenner. L. K.. Anderson. P. M.. Burke. 
              P. l.. Klein. D. L.. Slavin. R. E.. Schauer. B.. Borgankar. D. S.: 
              HLA-identical marrow transplants in aplastic anemia. acute leukemia. 
              and lymphosarcoma employing cyclophosphamide. Transplant. Proc. 
              8, 607-612(1976)
 
 14. Sparkes. M.C.. Crist. M.L.. Sparkes. R.S.. Gale. R.P.. Feig. 
              S.A. (F.or the UCLA Bone Marrow Transplant Team): Gene markers in 
              human bone marrow transplantation. Vox Sang. 33,202-205 ( 1977)
 
 15. Storb. R.. Prentice. R. L.. Thomas. E. D.: Marrow transplantation 
              for aplastic anemia: an analysis offactors associated with graft 
              re.jection. N. Engl. l. Med. 269,61-66 (1977)
 
 16. Thomas. E. D.. Ramberg. R. E.. Sale. G. E.. Sparkes. R. S.. 
              Golde. D. W.: Direct evidence for a bone marrow origin of the alveolar 
              macrophage in man. Science 2, 1016-1018 (1976)
 
 17. Thomas. E. D.. Storb. R.. Clift. R. A.. Fefer. A.. .Johnson. 
              F. L.. Neiman. P. E.. Lerner. K.G.. Glucksberg. H.. Buckner. C.D.: 
              Bone marrow transplantation. N. Engl. l. Med. 292, 832-843: 895-902(1975)
 
 18. Thomas. E. D.. Buckner. C. D.. Banaji. M.. Clift. R. A.. Fefer. 
              A.. Flournoy. N.. Goodell. B.W.. Hickman. R. 0.. Lerner. K. G.. 
              Neiman. P. E.. Sale. G. E.. Sanders. l. E.. Singer. l.. Stevens. 
              M.. Storb. R.. Weiden. P. L.: One hundred patients with acute leukemia 
              treated by chemotherapy. total body irradiation. and allogeneic 
              bone marrow transplantation. Blood 49,511-533(1977)
 
 19. Winston. D.l.. Gale. R.P.. Young. L.S.. Meyer. D.V. (For the 
              UCLA Bone Marrow Trans plant Team): Infectious complications of 
              human bone marrow transplantation. Medicine. 58, 1-31 (1979)
 
 20. Witherspoon. R.. Noel. D.. Storb. R.. Ochs. H. D.. Thomas. E. 
              D.: The effects of graftversus-host disease on reconstitution of 
              the immune system following marrow transplantation for aplastic 
              anemia or leukemia. Transplant. Proc. 10,233 236 ( 1978)
 |